v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Editing User talk:Shardok

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.


The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 23: Line 23:
 
  More confidence? It's obvious. That's *all* that needed said.
 
  More confidence? It's obvious. That's *all* that needed said.
 
:::Hmmm? not following you. "Confidence"? - where's that from? Anyway, it's not more of a "game" one way or the other, it's just a different view of/approach to the same game.  My theory, anyway.  Btw - I think I should delete most of that blather in stone management - it was all based on an illusion, after all, and adds nothing of interest except that I screwed up.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 18:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Hmmm? not following you. "Confidence"? - where's that from? Anyway, it's not more of a "game" one way or the other, it's just a different view of/approach to the same game.  My theory, anyway.  Btw - I think I should delete most of that blather in stone management - it was all based on an illusion, after all, and adds nothing of interest except that I screwed up.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 18:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 
:::: I know this topic is more or less dead by now, but I want to point out that your theory has some merit to it, Albedo. I have a computer that can keep DF reasonably speedy (if my screen's overflowing with cats or something, sure, there is a bit of a slowdown). I wasn't even aware you ''could'' experience the game so that each dwarf really ... well, ''matters''. Sure, they do if I zoom over em' individually, get to know em' and what they're about, but otherwise my fortress resembles a beehive or swarming colony of ants rather than a complex, genuine community of unique individuals. Don't get me wrong, that's what it inescapably appears to be in the beginning -- seven dwarves, each with their own strengths, weaknesses, sets of tasks, personalities and memorable, user-given nicknames -- but by the time immigrants start swarming in, all of that disappears. The numbers grow and grow, and it becomes inevitable that I treat it as one, huge dwarven super-organism. After getting use to this, playing the game at a rate that would actually allow me to acquaint myself with ''each one'' of my dwarves (albeit appreciate them more) sounds... well, dreadful. However, I suppose it'd have a huge upside; battles would be '''battles'''! Blow-by-blow blood-fests, not speedy skirmishes that sever tens of dwarves and goblins from the mortal plane in all but the blink of an eye... ¬.¬  --[[User:Bronzebeard|Bronzebeard]] 03:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 
  
 
== re: 2 secs ==
 
== re: 2 secs ==

Please note that all contributions to Dwarf Fortress Wiki are considered to be released under the GFDL & MIT (see Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Please sign comments with ~~~~

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)