v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing Dwarf Fortress Wiki talk:Improvement Drive
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Advertisements == | == Advertisements == | ||
Instead of pursuing this kind of thing, why not go with paypal and ask for donation? I'm curious, why are you forking that much money for a simple wiki ? 60$ a month seems a lot. Could you provide stats about bandwidth usage and stuff like that ? --[[User:Karl|Karl]] 22:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | Instead of pursuing this kind of thing, why not go with paypal and ask for donation? I'm curious, why are you forking that much money for a simple wiki ? 60$ a month seems a lot. Could you provide stats about bandwidth usage and stuff like that ? --[[User:Karl|Karl]] 22:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 13: | Line 9: | ||
− | Server usage statistics: | + | Server usage statistics:<br /> |
− | + | 3gb downstream / day used on average (peak: 3.3gb)<br /> | |
− | + | 322mb upstream / day used on average (peak 7.4gb, but I was uploading some stuff not related to the wiki)<br /> | |
− | + | Apache stats: (only the wiki is using Apache, and it's set to manage new instances of apache based on load)<br /> | |
− | + | Average: 7 instances of Apache running at 2.0% processor utilization each, 20 mb of memory each<br /> | |
− | + | Peak: 22 instances of Apache running at 3.2% processor utilization each, 23 mb of memory each | |
The above are moving averages. [[User:Briess|Briess]] 23:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | The above are moving averages. [[User:Briess|Briess]] 23:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Non-vanilla == | == Non-vanilla == | ||
Line 40: | Line 25: | ||
The problem is that MM's download is far from vanilla, and conflicts rear up regularly with newbies who have downloaded that and then refer to this wiki - which isn't the same interface in many respects. If we were to do something like that, we'd want to approach it with those problems in mind.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 23:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | The problem is that MM's download is far from vanilla, and conflicts rear up regularly with newbies who have downloaded that and then refer to this wiki - which isn't the same interface in many respects. If we were to do something like that, we'd want to approach it with those problems in mind.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 23:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | * Makes sense. The only gameplay differences I can recall off the top of my head are the stone control mod and the 'cat cancels store item in stockpile: too injured' 'fix'. What other changes are there that we would need to account for? | + | * Makes sense. The only gameplay differences I can recall off the top of my head are the stone control mod and the 'cat cancels store item in stockpile: too injured' 'fix'. What other changes are there that we would need to account for? ~~ |
== Verify this == | == Verify this == | ||
Line 46: | Line 31: | ||
o Category:Verify has a lot of stuff we need to verify. | o Category:Verify has a lot of stuff we need to verify. | ||
To "verify" sometimes requires "more research", and sometimes that research is either obscure, time consuming, random, tedious or a combination of the above. Do we need it? Yeah. Are we excited about it?... <looks around>--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 23:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | To "verify" sometimes requires "more research", and sometimes that research is either obscure, time consuming, random, tedious or a combination of the above. Do we need it? Yeah. Are we excited about it?... <looks around>--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 23:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |